Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: Airbnb in Airbnb India Private Limited vs Varun Mirchandani on 7 July, 2025Matching Fragments
% 07.07.2025
1. Respondent-Mr. Varun Mirchandani filed a complaint alleging deficiency in service.
2. The complaint was filed against Airbnb India Private Limited (petitioner herein).
3. Such complaint (Complaint Case No. 296/2022) is, presently, pending adjudication before learned District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (in short "District Commission"), South-II, Delhi. The petitioner herein (opposite party) sought dismissal of said complaint but learned District Commission vide order dated 06.07.2023, dismissed such application.
7. It is in the abovesaid backdrop that the present petition has been filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India.
8. Learned counsel for respondent/complainant appears on advance notice.
9. The question is, primarily, to the effect that whether the complaint could have been filed against Airbnb India Private Limited or it should have been filed against Airbnb Ireland UC.
10. Let a short reply be filed by respondent.
11. Learned Senior Counsel for Airbnb Ireland UC is also present.
12. In order to find out amicable solution of the matter, the parties are directed to sit together, in the interregnum, and to apprise the Court whether the matter can be amicably settled or not.
13. The complaint in question is stated to be fixed for tomorrow i.e. 08.07.2025 for final arguments.