Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: L.K..ADVANI in R. K. Anand vs The State Of Jharkhand on 6 July, 2021Matching Fragments
12. Though Mr. Luthra also relied upon the judgment of Delhi High Court in the case of L. K. Advani and others versus Central Bureau of Investigation reported in 66 (1997) Delhi Law Times 618 but the same is not relevant because to this case as the facts of that case are entirely different from the facts of this case.
13. Mr. Luthra next relied upon the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the case of State of Gujarat versus Mohammed Atik and others (1998)4 SCC 351 wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India has inter alia held that any statement made by an accused after his arrest, whether as a confession or otherwise, cannot fall within the ambit of section 10 of the Evidence Act.