Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: reverse discrimination in Ummid Social Welfare Foundation vs State Of Chhattisgarh 39 Wpc/3195/2019 ... on 27 February, 2020Matching Fragments
(xx) That, without having any data to suggest any 'inadequacy' in representation for the OBC, no vertical enhancement could have been effected by the State, exceeding the extent of reservation beyond 50%;
(xxi) That, the role of the Court is to be 'sentinel on the qui vive' as declared in State of Uttar Pradesh and Others vs. Deepak Fertilizers & Petrochemical Corporation, (2007) 10 SCC 342; (xxii) That, enhancement of the total reservation to 82% as per the 'Ordinance' under challenge, has resulted in 'reverse discrimination' to the general candidates; (xxiii) That, no extraordinary situation, as on date, has been suggested or substantiated for carving out excessive reservation to an extent of 82%;