Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

Copy of list of member of committee of Rs.1 Ex.PW1/1 (OSR) Lac. 

2. Chart of Committee of Rs.1 Lac  Ex.PW1/2 

3. Receipt dated 20.09.2011  of Rs.37,900/­  by Ex.PW­1/3 (OSR)  the   defendant   on   behalf   of   one   of   his Civil Suit no. 51741/16                                                       (Sushil Anuj Tyagi) Sunil Kumar  JSCC ­cum­ASCJ­cum­GJ Vs.       South East, Saket Courts/27.11.2018 Pratap                                                                                        Page no. 6 of 15 nominee   i.e   Vishwanath   Shukla   on   stamp paper. 

14. Chart of committee of Rs.50,000/­ Ex.PW1/13 

15. Receipt dated 15.02.2012  of Rs.28,400/­  by Ex.PW1/14 (OSR) the defendant on stamp paper

16. Receipt dated 15.02.2012  of Rs.28,400/­  by Ex.PW1/15 (OSR) the defendant

17. Police complaint dated 24.08.2014  Ex.PW1/16 (OSR) 

 8. The plaintiff examined PW­2 Govind who also gave his evidence by Civil Suit no. 51741/16                                                       (Sushil Anuj Tyagi) Sunil Kumar  JSCC ­cum­ASCJ­cum­GJ Vs.       South East, Saket Courts/27.11.2018 Pratap                                                                                        Page no. 7 of 15 way   of   affidavit   Ex.PW2/A   and   relied   upon   the   documents   already exhibited. The plaintiff examined PW­3 Mahesh  to give his evidence by way   of   affidavit   Ex.PW3/A   who   relied   upon   the   documents   already exhibited.  Plaintiff also examined PW­4 Jitender Chauhan who gave his evidence   by   way   of   affidavit   Ex.PW4/A   and   relied   upon   the   documents already exhibited. 

 13. The   plaintiff   also   examined   PW­2   Govind   who   also   gave   his Civil Suit no. 51741/16                                                       (Sushil Anuj Tyagi) Sunil Kumar  JSCC ­cum­ASCJ­cum­GJ Vs.       South East, Saket Courts/27.11.2018 Pratap                                                                                        Page no. 8 of 15 evidence   by   way   of   affidavit   Ex.PW2/A   and   relied   upon   the   documents already exhibited. PW­2 Govind stated to be one of the participants in the two   committees   of   Rs.   1   lakh   and   Rs.   42,000/­.   He   corroborated   the version of PW­2.

 28. In the light of above, this court is of the considered view that the suit is not maintainable and it is accordingly dismissed. 

 29. No order as to costs.

 30. Decree sheet be drawn accordingly.

 31. File be consigned to record room, after due compliance. Announced in the open court                  (Sushil Anuj Tyagi) today i.e on 27.11.2018         JSCC­cum­ASCJ­cum­GJ                      South East, Saket Courts:New Delhi                    27.11.2018 (r) Civil Suit no. 51741/16                                                       (Sushil Anuj Tyagi) Sunil Kumar  JSCC ­cum­ASCJ­cum­GJ Vs.       South East, Saket Courts/27.11.2018 Pratap