Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

2.2 This Original Application has been filed against the recommendations of the review DPC held on 02.08.2016 for the post of Superintending Engineer (Group-A post) in PB-3 of Rs.15600-39100 + GP Rs.7600/- in Central Ground Water Board (for brevity 'CGWB') for the vacancy year 2013-2014. The review DPC has assessed the applicant as Unfit as he could not achieve the requisite benchmark grading in the ACRs.

3. The applicant has submitted as under:-

3. 1 He joined the respondent-organisation as Assistant Executive Engineer (Group-A) Service on 28.07.1993, and was regularised with effect from 27.07.1995 vide order dated 08.09.1997. He was subsequently appointed as Assistant Executive Engineer in a substantive capacity with effect from 28.07.1995 vide Gazette Notification dated 12.10.1998 and got next cadre promotion as Executive Engineer (Group-A) on regular basis with effect from 17.07.2003.
5.2 After considering comprehensively all the relevant ACRs, the Review DPC assessed the applicant 'UNFIT' as he could not achieve the requisite benchmark grading in the ACRs. On the basis of the said assessment the Committee did not find the applicant suitable for promotion to the post of Superintending Engineer against the vacancy year 2013-14 in the Review DPC conducted by the Commission in compliance of orders dated 12.3.2015, 06.04.2015 and 31.05.2016 of the Tribunal.
5.3 The Ministry of Water Resources, River Development and Ganga Rejuvenation while conveying their disagreement with recommendations of the Review DPC, requested the Commission for review of decision of the Review DPC by considering the upgraded ACR for the year 2005-06 and final grading of ACR for the year 2006-07 in respect of the applicant.

Consequent of the DPC was that in view of the remarks given and discounted for the interpolation, the applicant could not have been awarded more than 'Good'. Hence, the Committee found the applicant 'Unfit' as he could not achieve the requisite benchmark grading in the ACRs.

On the basis of the above, we are satisfied that the respondents have substantially complied with the orders of this Tribunal and the CP is thus closed. Notices are discharged. No costs".

17. In the instant case we find that after considering comprehensively all the relevant ACRs, the Review DPC which met on 02.08.2016 (Annexure A-1) assessed the applicant 'unfit' as he could not achieve the requisite benchmark grading in the ACRs. On the basis of the said assessment the Committee did not find the applicant suitable for promotion to the post of Superintending Engineer against the vacancy year 2013-14 in the Review DPC conducted by the Commission in compliance of orders dated 12.3.2015, 06.04.2015 and 31.05.2016 of the Principal Bench of the Tribunal. Therefore, in view of aforementioned Subject: promotion 27 OAs Nos.200/00552/2018 & 200/01156/2017 judgements of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, we do not find any ground to interfere with the findings of the review DPC.