Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: MADRAS SOUTH in A.Ramalingam vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 26 November, 2012Matching Fragments
16.The first reason for declining extension of service is that the petitioner wrote a letter dated 20.07.2010 to the then Headmaster S.Jayaraj making baseless and false allegations against him that he collected fees without receipts. The school was at fault in regard to the same and therefore, he wanted the presence of journalists and police at the AGM of the Parents Teachers Association.
17.The proceedings dated Nil.02.2009 of the District Educational Officer, South Madras, Chennai, is placed before this Court. Paras 3, 6(1), 6(2) and 7 of the said proceedings are very much relevant and the same are extracted hereunder:
26 / 11 / 2012 Index : Yes Internet : Yes Note : Issue order copy on 27.11.2012 TK D.HARIPARANTHAMAN, J.
TK To
1.The Secretary to Government Government of Tamil Nadu Education Department Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009.
2.The Director of School Education DPI Campus, Chennai 600 006.
3.The Joint Director of Higher Secondary Education Chennai 600 005.
4.The Chief Educational Officer Panagal Building, Saidapet, Chennai 600 015.
5.The District Educational Officer Egmore, Chennai South, Chennai 600 005.