Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

(Delivered on /11/2019) As per: J.P. Gupta. J.

This order shall govern the disposal of aforesaid two writ pe- titions as these petitions are filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have challenged the legality and validity of the com- mon order dated 06/08/2013 passed by the learned Central Administra- tive Tribunal, Jabalpur in Original Application No.471/2010 (Rakesh Ku- mar Ranjan Vs. Union of India & others) & Original Application No.472/2010 (Mukesh Kumar Singh Vs. Union of India & others) and common order dated 28/10/2013 passed in Review Application No.29/2013 (Union of India & others Vs. Rakesh Kumar Ranjan) and Re- view Application No.30/2013 (Union of India & others Vs. Mukesh Kumar Singh) respectively ignoring the ban imposed on alternative appointment for medically unfit candidates by Railway Board Circular dated {W.P No. 21246/2013 & W.P No.21252/2013} 25/05/2009 and allowing the original applications with the direction to consider the case of the respondents, who were found medically unfit for the post of Traffic Apprentice, with direction to consider the case of the respondents for alternative appointment in the category for which they were found medically fit, within a period of 3 months from the date of communication of the order, considering that the circular dated 25 th May, 2009 is not applicable in the cases which were pending for consideration before the aforesaid date. In other words, the circular has prospective ef- fect.