Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

P.K.Ramakrishnan vs Ashok Kumar Singh Managing Director

Author: S.Siri Jagan

Bench: S.Siri Jagan

       

  

  

 
 
                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                    PRESENT:

                   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN

             TUESDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF MAY 2012/8TH JYAISHTA 1934

                        Con.Case(C).No. 104 of 2012 (S)
                       ---------------------------------------
       AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN .NO./ IN WPC.10843/2006 DATED

PETITIONER(S):
-------------

          P.K.RAMAKRISHNAN, AGED 54 YEARS, S/O.CHATHUTTY,
          PLUMBER, (HIGHER GRADE), P.H.SECTION
          PURAMERI, VADAKARA, KOZHIKODE

          BY ADVS.SRI.P.SANTHOSH KUMAR (PANAMPALLI NAGAR)
                 SRI.LUIZ GODWIN D'COUTH
                 SRI.K.P.CHANDRASEKHAR

RESPONDENT(S):
--------------

       1. ASHOK KUMAR SINGH MANAGING DIRECTOR
          AGED BOUT 40 YEARS, THE MANAGING DIRECTOR
          KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, JALA BHAVAN
          THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

       2. V.J.KURIAN, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT
          (IRRIGATION), GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT
          THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695001

          BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE MATHEW, SC, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY
          BY ADV. SRI.JOSEPH JOHN, SC, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY

          BY SRI.M.DINESH, SC, KWA

              SRI.JOSEPH JOHN, STANDING COUNSEL

         THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 29-05-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:



                        S.SIRI JAGAN, J
               ------------------------------------------
                    COC. No. 104 of 2012
              ---------------------------------------------
           Dated this the 29th day of May, 2012

                           JUDGMENT

The petitioner complains of non-compliance with Annexure- A1 judgment. Annexure- A1 judgment has today been modified by me in R.P.No.344 of 2012. In the above circumstances, this contempt case is closed.

S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE pm