Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

3. The respondent No.2 is a Trust created by State of Haryana. The said trust at one point of time was having a piece of agricultural land. The said Trust launched a scheme of imparting training to orphans. The petitioners came to be appointed as Motor Mechanic/Tractor Mechanic Instructor by respondent-Trust. They were appointed in 1986 and on account of closure of aforesaid scheme, they came to be terminated w.e.f. 29.03.1991. The respondent did not pay compensation to both of them as per Section 25FF of Industrial Disputes Act (for short, "ID Act') read with Section 25 FFF of ID Act. They approached Labour Court which by impugned order concluded that respondent has not complied with mandate of Section 25 FFF of ID Act but they cannot be reinstated and they are entitled to closure compensation of Rs.4812/- per person.