Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Delhi High Court - Orders

Dhariwal Wooltex Prop. International ... vs British India Corporation Ltd. & Anr on 28 January, 2022

Author: Amit Bansal

Bench: Amit Bansal

                          $~17
                          *    IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                          +     C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 17/2022

                                DHARIWAL WOOLTEX
                                PROP. INTERNATIONAL WOOLLEN MILLS         ..... Appellant
                                              Through: Mr. Mohan Vidhani, Advocate

                                                      versus

                                BRITISH INDIA CORPORATION LTD. & ANR.                   ..... Respondents
                                               Through: None.

                                CORAM:
                                HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL

                                              ORDER

% 28.01.2022 [VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING] I.A. 1457/2022 (for exemption from filing certified copies, copies with proper margins and true typed copies)

1. Subject to the appellant filing the original/certified copies/true typed copies of the documents relied upon within four weeks from today, exemption is granted for the present.

2. The application is disposed of.

I.A.1458/2022 (for permission to file additional documents)

3. This application seeks to place on record the additional documents as mentioned in paragraph 2 of the application

4. For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed. C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 17/2022

5. This is an appeal filed under Section 91 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 Signature Not Verified Signed By:SAKSHI RAMOLA C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 17/2022 Page 1 of 2 Signing Date:01.29.2022 10:31:39 against the impugned order dated 28th December, 2019, whereby the application for registration of the trademark of the appellant has been refused.

6. Issue notice.

7. Notice be issued to the respondents through all permissible modes.

8. Reply, if any, be filed within four weeks from service.

9. List on 30th March, 2022.

AMIT BANSAL, J.

JANUARY 28, 2022 dk Signature Not Verified Signed By:SAKSHI RAMOLA C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 17/2022 Page 2 of 2 Signing Date:01.29.2022 10:31:39