Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

3. One Naib Singh S/o Jangir Singh was allotted plot no.12 and the appellant purchased the same and applied to respondent no.1 for transfer of the plot in the name of the appellant and paid Rs.1271/- as transfer fee. Respondent no.1 transferred the said plot in the name of the appellant vide letter dated 26.07.2004 and as such, the appellant is a consumer.

4. As per terms and conditions of the site plan of the said scheme, an open place of about 70 feet width was left in front of the plot no.12 and its adjoining plots, for common use of the allottees. Now, respondent no.1 has illegally allotted a plot to Naib Singh S/o Jangir Singh in the said open space in front of plot no.12 which amounts to deficiency in service and unfair trade practice on the part of respondent no.1. By allotment of this plot in front of plot of the appellant, appellant has to suffer financial loss as the value of her plot has decreased and the appellant has been deprived of the open space. Now, the respondents are planning to raise construction which will diminish the value of the plot of the appellant. The appellant requested respondent no.1, but it was told that the plot would be allotted as it was already decided.