Delhi High Court - Orders
Modicare Limited vs Registrar Of Trademarks on 9 February, 2022
Author: Amit Bansal
Bench: Amit Bansal
$~16
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 8/2022
MODICARE LIMITED ..... Appellant
Through: Mr. Vikramjeet, Advocate.
versus
REGISTRAR OF TRADEMARKS ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar,
CGSC with Ms. Bushra Kazim, Mr.
Karan Chhibber and Mr. Zishan
Rizvi, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
ORDER
% 09.02.2022 [VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING] I.A. No.2205/2022(u/S 151 CPC)
1. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 8/2022
2. The present appeal has been filed under Section 91 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 impugning the order dated 26th February, 2021 passed by the respondent, whereby the application for registration of the trademark of the appellant being "SALON PROFESSIONAL", has been rejected.
3. Issue notice.
4. Notice is accepted by Mr. Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar, CGSC, on behalf of the respondent.
Signature Not Verified Signed By:SAKSHI C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 8/2022 Page 1 of 2 RAMOLA Signing Date:02.10.2022 23:29:455. Reply, if any, be filed within six weeks.
6. List along with connected matters on 4th April, 2022.
AMIT BANSAL, J.
FEBRUARY 9, 2022 at Signature Not Verified Signed By:SAKSHI C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 8/2022 Page 2 of 2 RAMOLA Signing Date:02.10.2022 23:29:45