Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

2. It is rather apparent that neither did the Director nor the HPOC address the real issue before them equating the post in the three departments as identical. They fell in error of reasoning in reaching the conclusion to wrongly advised stepping up the pay/pay scale of the petitioner. In any case, the recommendations could only have been accepted or rejected by the Finance Department of the State of Haryana. It may be relevant to mention that even in the recommendations of the Director he used the word "sympathetically" so that the pay anomaly is removed. There can hardly be a comparison between the post of Senior Draftsman in the Department of Town and Country Planning, the Department of Architecture and in the Department of Mines and Geology where the petitioner works. That apart, there is no specific pleading in the petition of the job requirements, duties and responsibilities, essential qualifications of a Senior Draftsman in the Department of Mines and Geology and those in the other departments.

3 of 5 Assistantship from an Institute with two years experience as a Draftsman in the Architectural or Town Planning Office; or ● Diploma in Civil Draftsmanship from an institution with three years experience in an architectural or town planning office