Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

5. In order to substantiate its case, prosecution had examined altogether nine PWs, out of whom, PW-1 Bachcha Yadav, PW-2 Dewanti Devi, PW-3 Rajesh Kumar Yadav, PW-4 Nitu Kumari, PW-5 Nunu Jha, PW-6 Dr. Vijay Pratap Singh, PW-7 Birendra Rout, PW-8 Bharat Ram and PW-9 Ashok Kumar Chaudhary. Side by side, had also exhibited the documents as Exhibit- 1 signature of informant over F.I.R., Exhibit-2 signature of victim over statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C., Exhibit-2/1 statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. of the victim, Exhibit-3 matriculation certificate of Nitu Kumari issued by B.S.E.B., Exhibit-4 signature of A.S.I. over formal F.I.R., Exhibit-5 writing and signature of Dr. V.P. Singh, D.M.C.H., Darbhanga over medical examination, Exhibit-6 signature of I.O. over case diary written upto paragraph-1 to 67, Exhibit-6/1 writing and signature of A.S.I. Birendra Rout over F.I.R. under Para-68 to 76. Defence had also examined one DW namely Ashok Lal Deo and had also exhibited two documents viz. Exhibit-A signature of appellant Baiju Yadav over original marriage card and Exhibit-A/1 signature of Nitu Kumari over said marriage card.