Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

3. To award costs in favor of the applicant and pass any order or orders which this Hon'ble Tribunal may deem just & equitable in the facts & circumstances of the case."

2. The assertion in the OA is that the applicant was falsely implicated in a case FIR No.562/14 U/S 354 IPC dt.3.6.2014. However, the complaints denied the offences alleged to have been committed by the applicant when their statements U/S 164 CrPC were recorded. Therefore, on the very next day he was granted bail. The applicant submits that the respondent No 3 vide order dt. 14.7.2014 without considering the pendency of criminal case illegally and in violation of Rule 12 of DP (P&A) Rules-1980 initiated departmental enquiry on the same set of allegations on which the criminal case was pending trial. On denial of charges by the applicant, a detailed enquiry was conducted by the enquiry officer who examined 6 PWs. The enquiry officer submitted his findings dt. 15.9.2014 to the disciplinary authority concluding therein that the charges leveled against the applicant are proved on (OA No.3656-2015) the basis of the unsigned statements of the complainants alleged to have been recorded U/S 161 CrPC. It is submitted that the findings of the E.O. are perverse in nature and are based on 'No-Evidence' and the applicant has been held guilty on surmises and conjectures without applying his mind to the defense statement of the applicant, who has illegally proved the charges.