Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: Forgery of document in Jagdish Lal Bhatia vs . Bihari Lal on 10 September, 2015Matching Fragments
The other allegation about forgery of documents is not clearly spelt out in the complaint. There is no allegation as to which of the document were forged by the accused. However, the complainant has filed certified copy of visiting card of Bihari Lal, Aadhar Card of Bihari Ram and PAN card of Bihari Ram. The PAN card does not show the address on it and the copy of visiting card show the address as WZ919, Near Dairy, Chuna Bhatti, Kirti Nagar.
At this stage, it is necessary to note that for commission of offence of forgery that is under 463 IPC, it is necessary that the document alleged to be forged should be false document. The term false document has been defined in section 464 of IPC. It is reproduced as below:
The other allegation about forgery of documents is not clearly spelt out in the complaint. There is no allegation as to which of the document were forged by the accused. However, the complainant has filed certified copy of visiting card of Hirdev Sharma and driving license of Hardev Sharma. The copy of visiting card show the address as WZ919, Near Dairy, Chuna Bhatti, Kirti Nagar.
At this stage, it is necessary to note that for commission of offence of forgery that is under 463 IPC, it is necessary that the document alleged to be forged should be false document. The term false document has been defined in section 464 of IPC. It is reproduced as below:
The other allegation about forgery of documents is not clearly spelt out in the complaint. There is no allegation as to which of the document were forged by the accused. However, the complainant has filed certified copy of visiting card of Ram Parkash, VoterID Card, Aadhar Card and PAN card. The PAN card does not show the address on it and the copy of visiting card show the address as WZ919, Near Dairy, Chuna Bhatti, Kirti Nagar.
At this stage, it is necessary to note that for commission of offence of forgery that is under 463 IPC, it is necessary that the document alleged to be forged should be false document. The term false document has been defined in section 464 of IPC. It is reproduced as below:
The other allegation about forgery of documents is not clearly spelt out in the complaint. There is no allegation as to which of the document were forged by the accused. However, the complainant has filed certified copy of visiting card of Bhogender Sharma and copy of the PAN card of accused. The PAN card does not show the address on it and the copy of visiting card show the address as WZ919, Near Dairy, Chuna Bhatti, Kirti Nagar.
At this stage, it is necessary to note that for commission of offence of forgery that is under 463 IPC, it is necessary that the document alleged to be forged should be false document. The term false document has been defined in section 464 of IPC. It is reproduced as below: