Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: common plot in The Cuttack Development Authority, vs Kanhu Charan Nayak, on 17 March, 2023Matching Fragments
3. The opposite party filed the written version stating that complainant is not a consumer and the learned District Forum lack jurisdiction to entertain the consumer complaint. The plea of the opposite party is that they had formulated a plotted development scheme commonly known as ' Bidanasi plotted development scheme'. They also admit that brochure was issued in the year 2001 and the complainant had applied for a 'F' category plot on 15.3.2001 by depositing Rs.20000/- towards initial deposit amount and Rs. 500/- towards the processing fee. They have also admitted that the complainant's application along with other documents were processed and the complainant was informed on 16.07.2003 that the lottery would be drawn on 26.7.2003 and accordingly, the lottery was drawn and the complainant was allotted 'F' category plot no. F/3767.