Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: fac 219 in Food Inspector vs Sant Lal & Ors. on 21 March, 2016Matching Fragments
5. On the other hand, it was argued on behalf of the appellant that case is well proved and the respondents were liable to be convicted. It was further urged on behalf of the appellant that the respondents challenged the report of the Public Analyst after considering the same as erroneous and moved an application for getting analysed the second counterpart by the Director, CFL and therefore, the report of the Public Analyst cannot be relied upon.
6. The Trial Court relied upon the decision of this court in Kanshi Nath vs. State, 2005 (2) FAC 219, Delhi High Court, wherein it was held as follows:-