Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

6. Plaintiff/appellant filed objection to the said execution proceeding to protect her possession in the suit property on 26.11.2020. Being aggrieved by the order dated 16.11.2021, the present appeal is being filed.

Grounds of the Appeal:

7. Ld. Civil Judge has failed to appreciate the facts and circumstances of the present case, while holding that the cause of action of the plaintiff/appellant is vague and is not clear as to the relationship of the appellant/plaintiff and respondent/defendant. The appellant/plaintiff is in continuous possession of the suit property since 2014 and the supporting documents are already on record.

8. Ld. Civil Judge has not considered the written arguments filed by the plaintiff in support of her case. The two grounds on the basis of which the suit of the plaintiff for injunction was dismissed by the Ld. Trial Court are: firstly the execution proceedings with respect to the suit property is already pending in the Court of Ms. Harleen Singh wherein plaintiff/appellant has filed her objection to protect her possession over the suit property. Secondly, the cause of action of the plaintiff/appellant does not disclose clearly any relationship between the appellant and respondent. It is submitted that Ld. Civil Judge has erred in observing that there is no relationship between the appellant/plaintiff and respondent/defendant, while they share a relation of landlord and tenant RCA SCJ 1/2022 Rita Gupta v.Satish Aggarwal Page No. 4 of 11 and moreover, she is in a continuous possession of the suit property since the year 2014.