Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

(1) As per allegations on 16.9.2010 at about 12:30 PM the accused Monu Jatt kidnapped / abducted the deceased / prosecutrix 'F', (name of the girl is withheld being a case under Section 376 IPC) aged 16 years, from the lawful guardianship of her father Nafi Ahmed from his house at B Block, Jahangirpuri, by alluring her and took her to Sonepat and thereafter to Jhajjar and married her forcibly without her consent after which he kept her illegally with intent that she may be forced or seduced to illicit intercourse. It is further alleged that between 16.9.2010 and 18.3.2011 the accused Monu Jatt committed rape upon the prosecutrix 'F' without her consent. It is further alleged that during her stay with the accused he gave serious beatings to her by uttering the words "tere baap ne mere khilaf mukadma darj karwa diya, tu meri nahi hogi to kisi ki bhi nahi hone doonga" and on 18.3.2011 the accused mixed some substance in the food and gave to the prosecutrix due to which reason she fell ill and her condition became critical after which he left her outside her house and subsequently she was expired at BJRM Hospital on 20.3.2011 during treatment.

(8) The witness has deposed that once again after twelve days, his daughter telephoned him and she desired to visit the house but he refused by saying tumne hamari pehle se hi bari be­ijjati kara di ab yahan ane ki karrorat nahin hai and also told her not to call again as they had already ended their relations with her and thereafter she never called telephoned him.

(9) According to the witness when his daughter met him at bus stand at Jahangir Puri, he asked her as to what happened with her, she told that she was not well since last four­five days and she further told him that her husband had left her i.e. chhor kar chala gaya. Witness has deposed that police recorded his statement many times. According to him, his daughter did not tell as to how she became ill and when he insisted she started weeping and hence thereafter he did not asked her anything and got her admitted in the hospital. The witness states that he does not want to say anything else. He further deposed that the police did not record statement of his daughter 'F' in his presence. He has identified the accused Monu Jatt in the court. According to him the date of birth of his daughter was 27.04.1994 and she was studying in the MC Primary Girls School, C Block Jahangir Puri, Delhi. The witness has deposed that his daughter also told him on phone that after marriage initially she was residing in Sonepat but the person residing in the neighbourhood told her that it was Jhajjar. According to the witness his daughter also told that Monu Jatt parde mein rakhta hai. He has deposed that his daughter also told on phone that Monu Jatt had taken her and got married with her at Sonepat.

(10) This witness has also been cross examined by Ld. APP for the state, wherein the witness has denied the suggestion that he told to the police in his statement that his daughter came to their house on 18.03.2011 at about 9.00­10.00 PM in an ailing condition. When confronted with statement Ex.PW12/PX­1 where it is so recorded. Witness has denied the suggestion that his daughter did not meet him on 19.03.2011. Witness has denied the suggestion that his daughter did not meet him at the bus stop 19.03.2011. Witness has further denied the suggestion that he told to the police in his statement that on 20.03.2011 when he telephoned to the police about 'F', they came to hospital and recorded her statement in his presence. Confronted with statement Ex.PW12/PX­1 where it is so recorded and has voluntarily explained that he remained outside therefore he cannot tell if any statement of his daughter was recorded by the police or not. Witness has further denied the suggestion that he told the police in his statement that his daughter 'F' told the police that on 16.09.2010 Monu Jatt to whom she knew, induced her for marriage and took her to Sonepat and then Jhajjar and kept her in vail (Ba­parda) or that she cannot tell the places where she was kept or that Monu Jatt forcibly married her and used to reside with her or that he made physical relations with her or that after some time she became ill or that Monu Jatt used to gave beatings to her or that he used to extend threats by saying "tere baap ne mere khilaf mukaddama darj karva diya hai, tu meri nahin hogi to kisi ki bhi nahin hone doonga" or that on 18.03.2011 Monu Jatt had mixed something in the food and made her consumer the same that is why her condition became deteriorated or that on 18.03.2011 at about 9.00­10.00PM Monu Jatt left her in front of her parental house. When confronted with statement Ex.PW12/PX­1 where it is so recorded.

(17) During leading questions put by Ld. APP for the state, witness has admitted that on 16.09.2010 at about 12.30PM her daughter went to the Dentist. According to her, she is illiterate and that is why she could not tell the exact month and time. She has stated that her daughter never came before her on 18.03.2011 at 9­10p.m. to her house in ailing condition. Witness has further deposed that she never told the IO that Monu Jatt had taken her to Sonepat and then to Jhajjar by inducing her for marriage and kept her in beparda condition and forcibly got married with her and also made physical relation or that she became ill and also gave beatings to her by saying that her father had got registered the case against him. According to her, she never told him that on 18.03.2011 he gave some stupifying substance in the food and her condition deteriorated or that he left her outside her house and left.