Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

2025:KER:74046 W.P.(C) No.19332 of 2025 and connected cases 3.22. W.P.(C)No.21229/2025: The petitioners are residents of the Perumbadappu Grama Panchayat (4th respondent). They objected to the delimitation notification due to irregularities in ward boundaries and the number of houses. Although the District Collector conducted an inquiry and submitted a report concurring with the petitioners' suggestions, the Delimitation Commission, after hearing, issued Ext.P6 final notification, without assigning any reason for rejecting the proposed modifications.

Although the Delimitation Commission conducted a personal hearing, Ext.P7 final delimitation order was 2025:KER:74046 W.P.(C) No.19332 of 2025 and connected cases issued in line with the proposal. The order is a non-

speaking one that does not provide any reason to overrule the objections.

3.69. W.P.(C)No.25866/2025: The petitioners are permanent residents of the Azhiyur Grama Panchayat (6th respondent). They objected to the delimitation proposal on the grounds that there were irregularities in ward boundaries and house allocation due to unscientific and arbitrary delineation, as well as ignoring the natural boundaries. Even though the petitioners attended the personal hearing, the Delimitation Commission, by Ext.P7 order, held that no amendments are required. Consequently, Ext.P8 final delimitation order was issued confirming the proposal.

3.72. W.P.(C)No.22222/2025: The petitioner, a resident of the Vijayapuram Grama Panchayat (6 th respondent), objected to the delimitation proposal on the grounds that there were irregularities in the ward boundaries and house allocation. The petitioner's proposal for an alternative delimitation was summarily rejected in the hearing. Accordingly, Ext.P7 final delimitation order was issued fully accepting the proposal of the 6th respondent.

3.83. W.P.(C)No.25618/2025: The petitioners are the residents of the Pulpatta Grama Panchayat. They objected to the delimitation proposal due to irregularities in ward boundaries and house allocation, resulting from the arbitrary refixing of boundaries without considering the natural boundaries.

Nonetheless, the Delimitation Commission, without considering the objections, issued Ext.P4 final delimitation order.

3.84. W.P.(C)No.25718/2025: The petitioners are residents of Ward No.28 in the Kochi Municipal 2025:KER:74046 W.P.(C) No.19332 of 2025 and connected cases Corporation. They objected to the delimitation proposal due to irregularities in ward boundaries and house allocation, resulting from the use of inconsistent and outdated population figures. Nonetheless, the Delimitation Commission issued Ext.P4 final delimitation order, without hearing the petitioners or considering their objections.