Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

There is a total deviation of 5993 Sq.ft., in the building constructed by the 3rd Respondent. The 3rd Respondent had constructed the residential flats deviating more than two times of approved plan and the violation is contrary to the Pondicherry Town and Country Planning Act, 1969, Rules and Regulations.

2.7. Earlier, the Petitioner filed W.P.No.30201 of 2013 before this Court praying for passing of an order by this Court in demolishing the deviated building constructed by the 3rd Respondent and this Court on 08.11.2013 was pleased to direct the 2nd Respondent / Member Secretary, Puducherry Planning Authority, Puducherry to pass an appropriate order based on the representation of the Petitioner dated 30.09.2013 on merits and in accordance with Law, after hearing the Petitioner as well as the 3rd Respondent, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the order.

The 2nd Respondent had not taken any further action and not complied with his own order as well as the order passed by the 1st Respondent. The Petitioner filed W.P.No.31266 of 2014 before this Court praying for passing of an order in directing the 2nd Respondent to demolish the deviated building constructed by the 3rd Respondent at Door No.91, Montorsier Street, Puducherry (at T.S.No.169, R.S.No.239 Pt. Old No.55, Ward D, Block No.13) in pursuance to the notice of the 2nd Respondent dated 15.04.2011, 29.11.2013 and 06.01.2014.

2.12. Later, the 3rd Respondent filed W.P.No.2108 of 2015 assailing the order passed by the 1st Respondent to remove the lock and seal in respect of his building. This Court by a Common Order dated http://www.judis.nic.in 03.03.2015 had directed the 1st and 2nd Respondents to take a pragmatic, purposeful, meaningful and result oriented consequent follow up action in an effective, efficacious and expeditious fashion within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Pursuant to the common order dated 03.03.2015, the 2nd Respondent / Member Secretary, Puducherry Planning Authority, Puducherry sealed the premises of the 3rd Respondent on 27.03.2015, which was communicated by the 2nd Respondent to the Petitioner through letter dated 16.04.2015. Thereafter, the 2nd Respondent had not taken any consequential action for demolition of the deviated building, as per the provisions of the Act.

2.13. The Petitioner filed W.P.No.19714 of 2015 before this Court seeking necessary direction being issued to the Respondents therein to demolish the deviated building pursuant to the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.31266 of 2014 dated 03.03.2015, but the Writ Petition was dismissed on the ground that the Authority will take appropriate action, as per Law. Moreover, the 2nd Respondent had informed the Petitioner's husband that the seal of the flat in top most two floors were in tact and not disturbed. Later, the Respondents 1 and 2 have not http://www.judis.nic.in taken any further action in respect of demolishing 'Deviated building' and the Respondents 1 and 2 maintained silence for taking action against the building.