Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

(e) What reasons have been recorded against my representation dated 26 February for keeping the said charge memo dated 15 February 22 intact and not revoking the same even after knowing that ibid charge memo was illegal and non est as stated above under para la to b above.

(f) provide para wise replies against my representation dated 26 February 22 (copy enclosed) of Engineer in chief who is Head of department and against my subsequent representations 10 oct 22,02 Feb 23,17 March 23 17 May 23,24 May 23 and 31 May 23 (copies enclosed) 2 (a) Intimate under which rule I can be charge sheeted twice on the same charge firstly on 08 February 2008 by CE Pathonkot zone (copy enclosed) against which I have already been awarded punishment on 06 January 2009 by CE Western command (copy enclosed) secondly on same charge on 15 February 2022 by CE Northern command (copy enclosed).

(b) provide para wise replies on above said referred my communication.

2 (a) Under which rule I have been charge sheeted twice on same charges once on 08 Feb 2008 (copy enclosed) and secondly on 15 Feb 2022 (copy enclosed).

(b) can I be punished twice on same charge when I have already be punished on 06 January 2009 (copy enclosed) and I had undergone and completed the punishment against the charge from 06 January 2009 to 05 January 2012 as stated under srl item 1 above as well as in representations fwd to pmo) enclosed herewith) in violation of articles 20(2)B of constitution of India. If no what action has been taken against said Major General CE northern command and others involved in matter willfully and thereafter remain discourteous even after receipt of thresh hold intimation vide my letter dated 26 February 22 and so many thereafter. 3(a) once when I had already been punished against CHARGE on 06 January 2009 for stoppage of increments for 03 years (copy enclosed) punishment implemented by department and undergone by me up to 05 January 2012 as described under srl item 1 above, then how and for which motive CE Northern command issued me Major Penalty charge sheet on 15 Feb 22 again on same charge which was already decided under charge sheet of 08 Feb 2008.

The CPIO furnished a reply to the complainant on 30.06.2023 stating as under:

1. It is intimated that, your RTI application is in the form of questionnaires which is not covered under RTI Act 2005, however para wise replies of RTI application are as under:-

(i) Para 1 & 6 : In this connection please refer this office letter No CRO/4/12/VIP/491/E1 Coord dated 02 Dec 2022.

(ii) Para 2 to 5: Not pertaining to this office. Please approach appropriate &7 auth.

examination and loading of revised data sheet after examination of case as stressed in the representation petitions.

(a)- G1/civil/SPARSH/MES/2022 dated 13 oct 22

(b)-G1/civil/SPARSH/MES/2022 dated 12 Nov 22

(c)-G1/civil/SPARSH/MES/2023 dated 31 Jan23 2 pl refer my representations dated 23 Nov 22, 12 Dec 22, 16 Dec 22, and 30 June 23 addressed to CRO (copies enclosed). Pl intimate the status of action taken and outcome.pl provide para wise replies on issues raised in ibid petitions.