Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: arsh in Court On Its Own Motion vs . State Of H.P. And on 24 December, 2025Matching Fragments
Court on its own motion vs. State of H.P. and .
others CMP No. 31570 of 2025, CMP No. 31735 of 2025 & CMP No. 31734 of 2025 in CWPIL No. 146 of 2017 CMP No. 31570 of 2025 of 24.12.2025 Present: Court on its own motion.
Mr. Arsh Rattan, Deputy Advocate General, for the applicants/State.
rt CMP No. 31735 of 2025 Mr. Mukesh Sharma, Advocate, for the applicant.
Mr. Arsh Rattan, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondents/State.
CMP No. 31734 of 2025 Mr. Surinder Prakash Sharma, Advocate, for the applicant.
Mr. Arsh Rattan, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondents/State.
It is submitted that on account of paucity of space of other open ground for organizing any sports activities, this application has been filed.
It has been submitted by learned counsel for petitioner that though the dates, for which permission is required, have not been mentioned due to ministerial mistake, however, permission be granted as per the dates mentioned in NOC of the Principal.
Notice. Mr. Arsh Rattan, learned Deputy Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.
Mr. Arsh Rattan, Learned Deputy Advocate General, accepting notice on behalf of the respondents, has confirmed the veracity of the no objection certificate, issued by the concerned Principal.
::: Downloaded on - 24/12/2025 20:39:01 :::CISAccordingly, the prayer made in the application is allowed, subject to adhere to the following conditions in .