Jobi P. Sam vs The Regional Transport Authority on 10 May, 2013

[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Jobi P. Sam vs The Regional Transport Authority on 10 May, 2013

Bench: K.Vinod Chandran

       

  

  

 
 
                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                            PRESENT:

                      THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN

            WEDNESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2014/23RD MAGHA, 1935

                                   WP(C).No. 4202 of 2014 (A)
                                      ---------------------------

PETITIONER :
--------------------------

            JOBI P. SAM,S/O. SAMUEL VARGHESE,
            PADINJATTINKARA HOUSE, ATTACHAKKAL.P.O.,
            KONNI, PATHANAMATHITTA DIST.


            BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS

RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------

          1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY,
               PATHANAMATHITTA,
               REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,PIN-689 645

          2. THE SECRETARY,REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY,
               PATHANAMATHITTA,PIN-689 645.


               R1 & R2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. R.REMA

            THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
            ON 12-02-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
            FOLLOWING:




sts

WP(C)NO.4202/2014


                              APPENDIX

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

P1    COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REGULAR PERMIT DATED 10/05/2013

P2    COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER FOR
      TEMPORARY PERMIT DATED 3/2/2014


RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:        NIL




                                                /TRUE COPY/


                                                P.A.TO.JUDGE


sts



                     K.VINOD CHANDRAN, J
                     - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                     W.P.(C).No. 4202 of 2014
                          - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                    Dated 12th February, 2014
                  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

                               JUDGMENT

The petitioner has applied for a regular permit as per Ext.P1 which is pending consideration of the 1st respondent. In the meanwhile, the petitioner applied for a temporary permit in the very same route as per Ext.P2. Ext.P2 is seen to have been filed on 3.2.2014. The only prayer of the petitioner is that the same may be considered in the context of the festival season and the need for a service in the said route. In the said circumstances, there shall be a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider Ext.P2 within a time frame, at any rate, within two weeks from today. It is also directed that the 1st respondent shall expedite the proceedings in Ext.P1.

Writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/-

K.VINOD CHANDRAN, Judge Mrcs

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

Kerala High Court