Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: Instagram in Mrs. Anugya Gupta vs Mr. Ajay Kumar & Anr. on 5 July, 2022Matching Fragments
4. The plaintiff further asserts that she adopted the device/logo on 23.04.2014. The said logo has also been displayed on the plaintiff‟s website, mobile applications and social networking accounts.
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:SHALOO BATRA Signing Date:06.07.2022 18:28:27 CS(COMM) 422/2020 Page 3 of 175. The plaintiff asserts that she also reaches out to the public through social networking platforms like Facebook, Twitter and Instagram, details whereof are as under:
Social Launch Date Link
Networking
Platform
Facebook 23 August https://www.facebook.com/SarkariResul
2013 t.ComOffcial/
Twitter January 2016 https://twitter.com/sarkari_result
Instagram 09/06/2018 https://www.instagram.com/sarkariresul
t.comofficial/
6. The plaintiff has also given the number of followers on her social networking platform as under:
Social Number of Followers
Networking 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total as on
Platform 24.09.2020
Facebook NA 649821 739796 788,594 7,88,594
Account
(created on
23rd August,
2013)
Twitter 12614 19530 28487 41600 41,600
Account
(created in
January
2016)
Instagram NA NA NA 29955 29,955
Total 8,60,149
24. The plaintiff has placed on record documents evidencing the registration of its domain name „SARKARIRESULT.COM‟ on 01.01.2012, as also the launch of the website on 21.06.2012. The plaintiff has further placed on record documents evidencing the creation of its YouTube channel page under the mark „SARKARI RESULT‟ on 11.06.2012. The YouTube Channel page also refers to its website, „SARKARIRESULT.COM‟. The plaintiff has further placed on record the invoice dated 13.10.2015, issued by Appy Pie LLC and addressed to it. The plaintiff asserts that the said payment was made for registration of the mobile application of the plaintiff on the iOS platform; an e-mail dated 14.10.2015 for the Google Play Store; and an e-mail dated 06.11.2015 for the iTunes store, again claiming that the same is for payment of charges for registration of her mobile application on these platforms. The plaintiff has further placed on record printouts from the website „Histats.com‟, claiming that in India alone, the visitors on its website were 210,30,84,546. The plaintiff has further placed on record the printouts of „sarkariresult.com Competitive Analysis, Marketing Mix and Traffic - Alexa‟ to contend that the plaintiff‟s website was ranked 868 globally and 65 in India as on 28.09.2020. The plaintiff further relies upon the „Google AdSense‟ report to contend that the estimated revenue from the plaintiff‟s website ranges between Rupees two to five crores per annum. The plaintiff further asserted that the total downloads as of 24.09.2020, from different platforms, such as, iOS, Android Google Play, and Windows, of her mobile application, were around 41,97,299; while the followers of the plaintiff on other social networking platforms, like Facebook, Twitter and Instagram, were 8,60,149.