Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: section 111 indian penal code in Satyendra Choubey vs The State Of Bihar on 8 July, 2025Matching Fragments
110. Thus, it is apparent that whoever does any act, with the intention or knowledge, which may cause death and in furtherance to the said intention and knowledge, he was doing an act towards it. However, it is required to be seen by the evidence brought on record by the prosecution whether the ingredients to prove, the case of prosecution beyond reasonable doubt, the charge under Sections 307 IPC have been established.
111. The essential difference between the offence punishable under Section 307 IPC and Section 302 IPC is that the offence under section 307 IPC is not culpable homicide; the victim finally survives. What is required by the prosecution to establish is that the accused had necessary intention or knowledge that if successfully effected the alleged act would have caused death. In "State of Maharashtra v. Kashirao" reported in (2003) 10 SCC 434, the Hon'ble Apex Court has held as under;