Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

Punjab and LR' C%':ane§Ege:'h_ The £3? 1 has denied emti disputed such afiegetirsn and submiited that ne cemeefifierx has been effected even in 9u¥'i§El§C}.
Therefmre, ihe essesntiais ef anti«mmpet&€ive agreement Le. agagtzreciabie adverse effect an cemgsetitiezz in indie and met {any partiwier market} are missing is": the present case.
512533 The {Be ieise questiened the jeriscfictien 0% the »':ommir3s§on in the matter. As gen' :13? 3., the aiiegatéums ef the informam: pertains tee a dispute between M30 and breaecaster which feiis wiithm the exciusive ciczmem of TDSAT and as such the present case mt being a dismzte amzzmg twe comgzetitere or buyer amtfi seifier, the Cmnmisaséon has me §ur'§sd§z:':ien eve? the StJ'&}§'eC't matter.

The {)P~3 has fgzrfmer submitted that it arises net enjey the dominant status in the market and therefare >:§1es'ej§w:.1:;:w§1u~e5ti:3:: of any examénai".§{m of their aimsive crmduct. The infarmans 1: on the Ogmosite Pames e~~ has access £20 aEE :7$§Q'%3§}§ net ciigcusazed the game xx. x 2"

3:": ms repmt. Therefere, it cannot be said that the termmatésn cf the agreement in the gzresemc case amourzts ta dga-n§a§ of market access its the £nfsz:s:'mamt.
53.33.12 The SP 3 has further subm%it§Te'::i"that the present case is a (§§S§3§.§t€ between M30 and bmadcaster which faiis within tha e>:a:§u5ive damain af TDSAT. Since 'aim present case is mi 3 {fsspeute between twm comgneiimrs or buyer and sefiier, the Cmnmissien has me ju:'i5t§i<:ti::>n met' the matter. Tim GP 3 has fzxrtimar submittsci that B{§'s report is <:snts'«::we:"sEsi and deveéd of merits and hag wmng§y ':mp§ie:atet€ and dmgged OP 3 irate the damaifi s.'-rncguirsg. Tixerefme, the Carnmissian shmzid reject the B5 :'eg3ar't and take its own fiecision on the £33333 of meritg of the case.