Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

l) The Respondent No.12/PP has provided swimming tank giving additional burden on the ground water consumption. The Project Proponent has not provided fire and safety system. The Project Proponent has not provided the ramp slope in the ratio of 1:10. The Project Proponent has not provided side margin as per the DC Rules.

It has not provided mandatory 15 % amenity spaces under DC Rules.

Further mentioned that all the ramps existing at project site are as per sanctioned layout plan with a minimum slope 1:10 or above.

ff PP has not provided site margin as per the As per the information DC Rules provided by PMC that site margin at project site is provided as per aforesaid sanctioned layout plans mentioned in S. No. A of Paragraph 3.0 as above.

gg. PP has not provided mandatory 15% As per the information Amenity space under DC Rules of PMC provided by PMC that the provision of amenity space is not applicable for the said project. As the said land comes under industrial (Brick Klin) zone. The provisions for residential development in such industrial zones (specifically for brick klin zone) as per the DCR rules (Appendix R-

ii. The environment consequences relate to a specific activity or a point source of pollution."

h) It is further submitted that the non -FSI areas of parking, balconies & services were not separately mentioned in the application as per the prevailing rules. The detailed plans pertaining to them which were submitted with the application were appraised by the EAC while granting the EC dated 25.06.2007. Hence, there is no violation in the old project.

i) Subsequently, all permissions from Corporation, under MRTP/DC Rules and Consent from the MPCB were obtained.