Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

22. It is also stated that the petitioner has sought various information under the Right to Information Act, 2005 ('RTI Act ', for W.P.(C) 12674/2019 and connected matter Page 7 short) on the appointment of the Director of respondent No. 2 CCRT and has stated that his appointment is illegal as no vigilance clearance was provided. Further, by relying upon information received under the RTI Act, Dr. Rahul Kumar had given technical resignation in CCRT on July 01, 2019 and was relieved on July 04, 2019 (AN) to join IGNCA as Research Officer under Direct Recruitment vide order CCRT/l1012/1/2010/719/3858 dated July 04, 2019 wit hout an y lien. Thereafter, CCRT had issued him a letter vide CCRT/11011/02/2011 dated November 25, 2019 stating that on the recommendation of DPC and with the approval of Competent Au thority Dr. Rahul Kumar is promoted to the post of Deputy Director (General) w.e.f. November 25, 2019. Dr. Rahul Kumar is required to join as Filed Officer in CCRT before joining as Deputy Director (General). Dr. Rahul Ku mar has not kept lien on the post of Research Officer in IGNCA as per information received under RTI (IGNCA) which shows t he m alafide intention of respondent (CCRT). Thus, it is st at ed Dr. Rahul Kumar has no right of promotion because he is not the in ternal can didate of CCRT at the time of promotion and lien was not ret ained by h im on Field Officer post and moreover IGNCA has not issued any letter t hat he cannot be absorbed in IGNCA due to his inefficiency etc .by overlooking the guidelines of DoPT issued on Technical Resignation & Lien vide OM No. 28020/1/2010- Estt ( C) dated August 17, 2016.