Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

11. During cross-examination on behalf of accused persons. He denied the suggestion that he did not visit the place of incident or that he prepared the site plan while sitting in the office at the instance of IO.

12. Another Ct. Naveen having No.1679/RD member of the Mobile Crime team was examined as PW-3. He deposed that on 15.04.2017 he along with SHO PS: Narela went to PS Gohana Sadar Sonepat. He inspected vehicle No. HR 55AA 4321 for chance prints and lifted two chance prints from the centre mirror and two from the left side back window. He used the black powder for developing the chance prints and lifted the same with the help of tape. He sent the chance prints to Finger Prints Bureau, Kamla Market.

24. During cross-examination on behalf of accused Yadvender, Sagar and Mohit he deposed that he did not mention the time in register No.19 when he handed over the exhibits to the police official for taking to the FSL. He did not obtain signature of ASI Ram Kishan in the register No.19. He denied the suggestion that entries in register No.19 and 21 are ante dated and ante timed.

25. Inspector Dheeraj Singh was examined as PW-9. Accused Yadvender Kadyan @ Vicky @ Moxx were taken out from lockup. He along with SI Adesh Kumar and other staff along with accused left the police station. Accused led them to village Kasandi Distt. Sonepat Haryan on Badhana Road. At the corner of the field near the drain he pointed out the place where he had burnt his blood stained clothes vide pointing out memo Ex.PW9/A. Thereafter accused led them to Saini Pura chowk, Gohana near Daksh Engineering college and pointed out the place where he abandoned the robbed car vide pointing out memo Ex.PW9/B. He correctly identified the accused.

30. Sh. Sombir was examined as PW-12. He deposed that he is working in Honda Company, Manesar as Machine Handler for the last 2 years. He was using mobile phone No.9467506799 of BSNL for the last one year. He got issued the said mobile number from BSNL vide customer application form Ex.PW12/A having his photograph on it at point X. He also gave the copy of election ID card as Ex.PW12/B.

31. He was cross examined by Ld. APP as he was resiling from his earlier statement given to the police. In the cross examination by Ld. APP he admitted that he is residing in Rajiv Colony Gurgaon for the last 1 ½ years in a tented accomodation. He admitted that Neeta daughter of his uncle (Tau Ram Niwas) was married in village Shiva, Distt. Sonepat, Haryana. He denied the suggestion that Mohit resident of Gohana became his friend or that they used to visit their house or that he used to talk on mobile phone of Mohit having number 8685009372. He denied the suggestion that mobile phone number of Mohit is reflected in call detail record of his mobile number. He denied the suggestion that Yadvender @ Vicky was having mobile phone No.9205127677 or that he used to talk with Yadvender on his mobile phone number or that the number of Yadvender is reflected in his call detail record. He denied the suggestion that he told this fact that Mohit and Yadvender were his friends. He was confronted with his statement Ex.PW12/C. He admitted that accused Yadvender @ Vicky is his nephew son of Neeta daughter of Ram Niwas. He denied the suggestion that on 27.03.2017 Mohit s/o Sh. Rajender and his friend Sagar son of Sulesh came to his room or that they stayed in his room for two days. He denied the suggestion that on 29.03.2017 Yadvender S/o Sh. Neeta also visited his house or that Mohit, Sagar and Yadvender were present at his room when he left for performing his duty on 30.03.2017 at about 10:40 pm. He denied the suggestion that on 31.03.2017 at about 7:30 am and he reached his room after performing his duty and his nephew Sushil @ Kuldeep informed him that Vicky, Mohit and Sagar had left the room in the night hours at about 1:30 am. He denied the suggestion that at about 1:00 or 12:30 noon he received telephone call of Mohit from unknown Mobile Number or that Mohit told him to vacate the room as they had killed Taxiwala or that police can come anytime. He was confronted with his statement Ex.PW12/C. He admitted that on 30.03.2017 at about 10:40 pm he went for performing his duty and he reached at 1:00 pm in his village Goodha on 01.04.2017. He identified accused Yadvender present in the court. He stated that he does not know if Yadvender is also known by the name of Moxx. He does not know the father name of accused Yadvender Kadyan or whether Sukhbir Kadyan is father of Yadvender Kadyan. He denied the suggestion that accused Mohit and Sagar are present in the court or that he is deliberately and intentionally not identifying them. He denied the suggestion that Mohit and Sagar visited his room on 27.03.2017 and stayed there for two days. No question was put to the witness on behalf of accused Sagar, Mohit and Amit @ Uttam.

62. During cross examination on behalf of accused Mohit, he denied the suggestion that he generated the false and fabricated CDR at the instance of IO. Using one sim two calls can not be made at the same time. He admitted that two numbers can not be dialed at the same time from one phone.

63. Sh. Sudesh Pal Tomar, SD Admn, BSNL, Sonepat was examined as PW-22. He has brought the record of mobile phone no.9467506799. As per record, this number was issued in the name of Sombir son of Sh. Ram Phal r/o H.no.33C, Vill Gudha, Tehsil Gohana, Dist.Sonepat, Haryana. He proved the copy of CAF as Ex.PW-12/A. Photocopy of voter ID card annexed with customer application form is proved as Ex.PW-12/B. The CDR of this mobile phone number from 01.03.17 to 01.04.17 is proved as Ex.PW-22/A and certificate under Sec.65 B of Evidence Act is proved as Ex.PW-22/B.