Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: consequential damage in Fir No.345/05 Ps-Sarita Vihar State vs Shakil Ahmad Page No. 1 Of 15 on 10 October, 2018Matching Fragments
21. PW-6 Pradeep Mishra deposed that there were buffaloes on the road and the bicycle rider lost its balance owing to the movement of buffaloes on the road and fell on the road. He did not attribute any rashness or negligence on the part of the RTV Driver.
22. The Mechanical Inspection Report Ex.PW9/A has been duly proved by the prosecution. As per the report, there are minor scratches on the front left side bumper of the RTV. No Mechanical Inspection of the bicycle was carried out. The minor scratches on FIR No.345/05 PS-Sarita Vihar State Vs Shakil Ahmad Page no. 13 of 15 the RTV are not sufficient to corroborate the offence unless consequential damage is also see on the victim's bicycle more specifically when one of the witnesses has deposed that victim was hit by buffaloes and fell on the road and did not attribute any rashness or negligence on the RTV Driver. No photographs of the site or the offending & victim's vehicle were clicked by the IO.