Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

"12. The records suggest that on 11th August, 1995, the appellant requested the respondents to transfer him from Palanpur to any nearest place at Ahmedabad or Nadiad or Anand which was accepted by respondents and an order of transfer was issued by the respondents on 21-8-1995 transferring the appellant to the office of DCIO, Nadiad with immediate effect. On 25-8-1995, the Joint Assistant Director, SIB ordered to release the appellant from Palanpur to join duty at Nadiad with effect from 31-8-1995. In view of such order the appellant was relieved and joined at Nadiad. However, the order of transfer was cancelled by the respondents on 4-9-1995 and he was transferred at a distance place which was challenged by him before the Central Administrative Tribunal.

13. After cancellation of the order of transfer the appellant sent a complaint on 18-9-1995 before the authorities that the DCIO, Palanpur, Mr. P. Venkateswarlu was not allowing him to join duty. The order of transfer was challenged by him before the Central Administrative Tribunal, Ahmedabad alleging bias against Mr. Venkateswarlu, DCIO, Palanpur, in-charge of the office which was accepted by the Central Administrative Tribunal and the order of transfer was set aside. Thereafter appellant joined duty on 11-12-1995 and proceeded on leave for 11 days due to illness of his father.