Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

Holding that the proceeding against the accused person who was absconding and subsequently against whom a split up charge sheet was filed was quashed."

8. In view of the above said decision and also the factual aspects of this particular case, I am of the opinion that the judgment of acquittal is equally extended so far as the petitioner is concerned who was arrayed as A2 in SC No.27/2015. No purpose would be served if this petitioner is tried once again on the same allegations proposed evidence on the prosecution side. Therefore, a split up charge sheet registered against the petitioner and consequential registration of a Sessions Case No.123/2017 deserves to be quashed. Hence, I proceed to pass the following: