Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

12] As per guidelines 9 (i), thus, TAC was to carry out visual inspection of the said building of internal and external plaster, plumbing, drainage, etc., and as per clause (ii), it was further to carry out specific tests like ultrasonic pulse velocity test etc., as may be considered necessary by the TAC. To show the compliance of these guidelines, learned counsel for respondent corporation has relied upon the report of TAC and its observations therein made in their meeting on14.6.2018. The report shows that TAC has carried out the visual inspection of the suit site on 12.6.2018, and on the basis of the said visual inspection and the Structural Audit report, submitted earlier and thereafter by Avon Consultants, who has after carrying 915 AOST 30732 OF 2018.doc out various tests of the said premises, as directed in guideline No. 9(d) (I) and(ii) of the Writ Petition (L) No.1134 of 2014. 13] Learned counsel for respondent No.2 has produced on record the Structural Audit report dated 12 th April, 2018 which is submitted by Avon Consulting Engineers, who was appointed by the Municipal Corporation for carrying out structural audit report of this building. This report goes to show that Avon Consulting Engineers, has carried out all the tests which are mentioned above in guideline 9(d) (ii) laid down by this Court in W.P. (L) No.1135 of 2014. Thereafter Committee has given analysis as follows:-

All inspection, observation and facts presented in this report relate to the findings as on the date of inspection. But the process of deterioration will continue"

14] Thus, there is complete compliance of the guidelines given by this Court in W.P. (L) No.1135 of 2014 by the TAC. When there is structural audit done by Avon Engineers, which was appointed ;by the Municipal Corporation itself, as TAC Committee cannot be expected to have expertise in all the matters, to carry out these requisite tests 915 AOST 30732 OF 2018.doc and this report is not challenged and on the basis of this report TAC has arrived at its own opinion, no fault can be found with the TAC report so as to challenge the same on the ground that there was non compliance of the order passed by this Court.