Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: unsigned statement in Chetan Sharma vs State & Another on 17 November, 2016Matching Fragments
9. The aforesaid portion would indicate that the Division Bench was conscious and aware that the Delhi Police was already looking into the petitioner's complaints, subject matter of the present application. The petitioner was to make a further statement before the investigating officer of the CBI. The court observed that the Investigating Officer of the CBI, after recording the petitioner's statement would act as per law and arrive at his own conclusion as to whether or not any offence was made out. The application was disposed of recording and giving liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh application to have the investigation transferred to the CBI. The petitioner thereafter appeared before the Investigating Officer of the CBI in RC No. 19(A)/2013 (which is a different case) on 19 th November, 2013 and gave a signed letter and unsigned statement stating that this was in compliance of the order dated 16th September, 2013. Copies of orders passed in several writ petitions as well as a copy of FIR No. 114/2008 registered pursuant to the order dated 9th January, 2008 in Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 29/2008 and FIR No. 33/2012 registered pursuant to the order dated 28th July, 2010 in Writ Petition (C) No. 5026/2010 which, it was averred, were under investigation by the Crime Branch of the Delhi Police, were submitted.