Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

48. Learned counsel for the Plaintiffs also contended that prior use of the trademark Blenders Pride by the Defendants was sporadic, experimental or intermittent and not substantial, continuous or evidencing genuine commercial use. Reference was made to the invoices of sale filed by the Defendants, which as mentioned above, were alleged to be procured documents and to the insignificant sales evidenced by these documents. According to learned counsel for the Plaintiffs, such use by the Defendants could not be described as prior use. Reliance was placed upon a few decisions of this Court, notably Century Traders v. Roshan Lal Duggar and Co., , Bimal Govindji Shah v. Pannalal Chandulal 1997 (2) Arb.LR 76, and East African (I) Remedies Pvt. Ltd. v. Wallace Pharmaceuticals Ltd., .