Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: punishments under sec 420 in Chekka Guru Murali Mohan vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 19 January, 2021Matching Fragments
This batch of Criminal Petitions, under Section 482 Cr.P.C., are filed, seeking quash of the common F.I.R. in Crime No.49 of 2020 of C.I.D.P.S., A.P., Amaravati of Mangalagiri, registered against the petitioners for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 409, 406 and 120-B of I.P.C.
2) A person by name Sri Salivendra Suresh of Velagapudi village, who is totally a stranger to the sale transactions in question, which are sought to be impeached on the ground of playing fraud and cheating the sellers of the land by the petitioners, who are purchasers of the lands, lodged a report with Mangalagiri Police.
5) Based on the said preliminary enquiry report dated 16.09.2020 wherein it is stated that the preliminary enquiry revealed that the contents of the report lodged by the de facto complainant disclose commission of a cognizable offence, the present F.I.R. was registered as per the instructions of the Addl. Dy.G.P., CID, AP., Mangalagiri, in Crime No.49 of 2020 for the CMR,J.
Crl.P.No.4819 of 2020 & batch offences punishable under Sections 420, 409, 406 and 120-B of IPC. The said case is now under investigation.
6) The petitioners in this batch of Criminal Petitions, who are all shown as accused in the aforesaid F.I.R., sought quash of the said common F.I.R. registered against them on the ground that the facts of the case even if they are taken to be true at its face value do not constitute any offence punishable under Sections 420, 409, 406 and 120-B of IPC and allowing the proceedings to be continued against them pursuant to the registration of the aforesaid F.I.R. would amount to abuse of process of law.
Crl.P.No.4819 of 2020 & batch the seller that the capital is going to be located in the said area and as they did not disclose the said fact before purchasing the lands and concealed the said fact it would clearly come within the purview of the explanation appended to Section 415 of IPC of dishonest concealment of fact which is a deception within the meaning of the said section. Therefore, he would submit, that a clear case of Section 420 IPC is made out. So, he contends that there is no merit in the contention of the petitioners that the facts of the case do not constitute any offence punishable under Section 420 IPC and in fact the facts of the case clearly constitute the offences punishable under Sections 420 and 120-B of IPC.