Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

The Management got examined Sh. Dinesh Chugh S/o Sh. Satpal Chugh as MW-1. He exhibited his affidavit as Ex.MW1/A and relied upon the following documents:

Ex. MW1/1 Letter of appointment (OSR) Ex.MW1/2 Full and Final settlement Receipt (OSR) Ex. MW1/3 Attendance Record April 2017 to October (colly 14 2017 pages) (OSR) Ex.MW1/4 Reply to demand notice and postal receipt (OSR) Ex. MW1/5 ESI Return October 2015 to March 2018 LID No. 4145/18 Sandeep Kumar Vs. A.S. Plastics Page 6 (colly 20 pages) (OSR) Ex. MW1/6 ESI returns from April 2009 to September (colly 44 2015 pages) (OSR) Ex. MW1/7 Attendance register from November 2016 to (Colly 10 March 2017 pages) (OSR) Ex. MW1/8 Intimation of closure to ESI (OSR) Ex. MW1/9 Intimation of Closure to EPFO (OSR) Ex. MW1/10 Intimation dated 24.10.2019 of Cancellation (colly 4 of GST pages) (OSR) Ex. MW1/11 Reply filed before the Conciliation Officer (OSR) Ex. MW1/12 Rejoinder filed by the workman before (colly 5 conciliation officer pages) (OSR)

It is relevant to pen down here that management, in order to prove that management firm has been closed down its operation, has relied upon copy of intimation to closure to ESIC Ex. MW1/8 (OSR), copy of Intimation to closure to EPFO Ex. MW1/9 (OSR) and intimation dated 24.10.2019 of cancellation of GST Ex. MW1/10 (colly 4 pages) (OSR).

I have gone through the above said documents exhibits Ex. MW1/8 and EX. MW1/9. Perusal of the same, it is found that they are merely letters allegedly written to the the Joint Director, ESIC (EX. MW1/8) and RPFC EPFO (EX. MW1/9).