Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: environment act in R.Kavin vs The Secretary To Government on 20 June, 2019Matching Fragments
Yours faithfully,
7. G.O.(Ms).No.84, Environment and Forests (EC.2) Department, dated 25.06.2018, reads thus:-
GOVERNMENT OF TAMILNADU ABSTRACT Environment - 110 Announcement of the Hon'ble Chief Minister on the floor of the Assembly on 05.06.2018 regarding ban on one-time use and throwaway plastics irrespective of thickness with effect from 01.01.2019 under Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Notification - Orders - Issued.
The Hon'ble Chief Minister on 05.06.2018, on the Legislative Assembly, with a view to make Tamil Nadu Plastic Free, has announced, ban on one time use and throwaway plastics', irrespective of thickness, with effect from 1st January, 2019 under the provisions of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.
2. Accordingly, the following Notification will be published in the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette:-
NOW, THEREFORE, in exercise of the powers conferred under section 5 of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 (Central Act 29 of 1986) read with Government of India, Ministry of http://www.judis.nic.in Environment and Forests Notification No.S.O.152(E), dated 10th February, 1988, the Governor of Tamil Nadu hereby issues the following directions:-
2. This Notification will come into force on the 1st January, 2019.
16. The power of the Central Government and its delegatee under Section 5 of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 was considered by the Supreme Court in A.P. Pollution Control Board II v. M.V.Nayudu [2001 (2) SCC 62]. The Supreme Court, while considering the Government Order issued by the State of Andhra Pradesh in G.O.No.111, dated 08 March, 1996, prohibiting the location of industries in specified areas, referred the notification dated 10 February, 1988 issued by the Central Government delegating the power under Section 5 of the Environment Act to the State Governments of Andhra Pradesh, Assam, Bihar, Gujarat, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Mizoram, Orissa, Rajasthan, Sikkam and Tamil Nadu. The Supreme Court observed that by virtue of the delegation, the delegated authority could issue order prohibiting the location of industries in specified areas.