Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

9. Learned Senior Advocate Mr. Mehta would thereafter contend that with reference to publication/printing of the name as well as roll number of the candidate on the OMR sheet is concerned, learned Single Judge has come to the conclusion that the defence raised by the GSRTC is not tenable because the printing of name is capable of giving rise to manipulation. However, the learned Single Judge has failed to consider the fact that nothing was shown by the petitioners that because of printing of name and roll number on OMR sheet any malpractice is committed during the selection process. At this stage, it is submitted that immediately upon completion of the written examinations; the OMR sheets had been scanned and uploaded on the internet where the candidates could see the same. Thus, there is no scope of manipulating any marks or to favour any candidate so as to select him after having been declared as failed.