Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

2025:JHHC:38443-DB In course of his cross-examination, besides repeating his earlier statement, he has stated that the police had not taken any such statement from him.
Further, he has denied the suggestion that before their reaching to the place of occurrence, the deceased, Rodea Samad, had already died and he was making false statement at the instance of the informant.
P.W.9 is Ganga Ram Bodra. In his deposition, he has deposed that he had seen the deceased going along with the accused persons to village Jagarnathpur for attending a marriage. According to him, they had gone to watch a dance programme there from where at 3 O'clock they left together for their own houses.
He has further deposed that at about two years back, he had gone to village Jagarnathpur to watch a dance 2025:JHHC:38443-DB programme. The accused persons and the deceased had also gone there. At about 3 o'clock in the morning, the dance programme ended whereafter according to him, the deceased and the accused persons together left the place.
In his cross-examination also he has stated that he had not seen the deceased along with the accused persons at the time of going to watch the dance programme rather he had seen them returning together after the programme ended.