Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

d) An order for delivery-up to the Plaintiffs, of all the counterfeit/unlicensed copies of the Plaintiff's software, and/or articles/software to which have been applied the Plaintiffs' trademarks, or any other mark which may be identical with or deceptively similar to the Plaintiffs trademarks without license of the Plaintiffs, the duplicating equipment used in the copying the software of the Plaintiffs, including computers, compact disc writers, stampers, burners, "plates" as defined in Section 2(t) of the Act, hard disks, diskettes, packaging and advertising material, labels, stationery articles and all other infringing material under Section 59 of the Act;

4. Defendants chose not to enter appearance after being served. Vide order dated 20.2.2004 they were proceeded ex-parte. Plaintiff has led evidence by way of affidavit.

5. Evidence by way of affidavit of Mr. Nikhil Krishnamurthi proves the following:-

(i) Ex.P.1, power of attorney issued by the plaintiff company in favor of Mr. Nikhil Krishnamurthi to institute the suit, sign and verify the pleadings.

(ii) That the plaintiff is in the field of computer programmes (Software), the said computer software includes various operating systems such as MS-DOS, Microsoft Windows and Microsoft Office.