Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

(viii) (g) that after the F.I.R. was registered by the S-1, St.Thomas Mount Police Station, the said persons did not make any further attempt to interfere with their possession and enjoyment of the disputed property. At the same time, the said Mrs.R.Pankajammal executed a fresh power of attorney in favour of one P.Nagaraj and B.Murali on 26.02.2009 who in turn fabricated an agreement of sale dated 02.03.2009 with Mr.K.Thirumaniselvam (A-party). It is pertinent that while executing the power of attorney dated 26.02.2009, the earlier power of attorney executed by Mrs.R.Pankajammal in favour of Kesavamoorthy and Mrs.Ramani on 20.02.2008 and the sale agreements entered into with H.S.Anand of Coimbatore on 20.02.2008 and one S.Ravichandran on 29.12.2008 were not cancelled. It is therefore evident that the aforesaid documents are fabricated and concocted documents created for the sole purpose of encumbering their property in various ways and it is on the strength of the fabricated sale agreement dated 02.03.2009 entered into with Mrs.R.Pankajammal that K.Thirumaniselvam (A-party) is now claiming possession over the disputed extents.

(ix) (m) that thereafter, the said V.Amar, S/o.S.P.Velayutham, executed a settlement deed dated 13.10.2008 in respect of the said properties in favour of his father, S.P.Velayutham himself, registered as Doc.No.2881 of 2008 before the S.R.O., Alandur (Annexure-36). This document is also a fabricated and concocted document created for the purpose of land grabbing, by virtue of which S.P.Velayutham (B-party) is now claiming title to the entire 100 grounds of lands owned by their Group in S.Nos.16 to 19 & 21 of Alandur Village including the disputed extents in S.No.16/7, apart from certain other properties owned by various third parties. The said S.P.Velayutham, in collusion with the certain officials of the Alandur Municipality and the Revenue Department has managed to obtain Town Survey Patta for the properties in his name without notice to any of the existing Pattadhars or their predecessor in title and by manipulating the records and has also managed to remit the tax in respect of the property. Indian Bank had also addressed a letter dated 08.10.2007 addressed to the Tahsildar, Tambaram with a copy marked to the District Collector requesting them not to issue patta to the said S.P.Velayutham (Annexure-37) as the patta obtained by S.P.Velayutham is through fraudulent means and the same is illegal. They have also submitted their written objections to the same to the learned Revenue Divisional Officer on 28.04.2009 itself (Annexur-38).

(h) the said V.Amar, executed a settlement deed in favour of the fourth respondent on 19.10.2008 and registered as document No.2881 of 2008 before the Sub-Registrar, Alandur. It is on the basis of these fabricated, forged and fraudulent documents that the fourth respondent is seeking to claim title and possession over the disputed extents as well as the other extents of property owned by the M.V.R.Group in Alandur Village. Further, using the said forged, fabricated and concocted documents, the fourth respondent also managed to fraudulently obtain Town Survey Pattas in his name even while the petitioner as well as the other owners are holding Revenue Pattas for the entire extents and Town Survey Pattas for a substantial extent of lands owned by them. The fourth respondent also manipulated the Revenue Records pertaining to the property in collusion with the concerned officials so as to include his name in the said records in a fraudulent manner. In any event, since the fourth respondent cannot and has not obtained any title over the properties by virtue of the settlement deed / sale deed executed between himself and his son V.Amar, all the other documents like Town Survey Patta and other Revenue Records relied on by him will not confer any title upon him in respect of the disputed properties. It is therefore evident that the said persons have knowingly manipulated the Pimash Numbers and the Survey Numbers of the properties while executing the sale deed with the sole intention of grabbing a very valuable property owned by the M.V.R.Group including the disputed extents in Survey No.16/7.

(t) the second respondent has exceeded her jurisdiction by traversing beyond the scope of reference by giving findings in respect of the properties which do not pertain to the dispute under reference and making wild allegations against the petitioner without adverting to the facts and documentary evidences on record. The second respondent has accepted all the contentions made by the fourth respondent without even ascertaining the veracity of the same. The second respondent has also proceeded to give finding of facts which are wholly contrary and contradictory to the documents available on record with a view to uphold the false claim of the fourth respondent. The second respondent has also failed to apply her mind even to the basic documents through which the fourth respondent is seeking to establish title and possession over the properties, which, if perused, would clearly reveal that the same are fabricated and concocted documents.