Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

(ix) (e) that a perusal of the schedule of the property given under the power of attorney would itself show that the same is fabricated and concocted document. The description of the properties in the schedule is made with reference to certain Pimash Numbers. No co-relating survey numbers of the property are given in the schedule even though the properties have been allotted Survey Numbers more than 30 to 40 years back. The reference to the properties by mentioning the Paimash numbers alone has been wantonly made for the purpose of staking a false claim over the properties comprised in Survey Nos.16 to 19 and 21 of Alandur Village owned by the various individuals / companies of the M.V.R. group.

(ix) (h) that therefore, the power of attorney executed by the said persons in favour of S.P.Velayutham representing to the owners of the 108 cents of land comprised in survey numbers 16/20, 18/2, 18/5, 17/5, 21/3 and 21/4 of Alandur Village through their corresponding Paimash numbers is nothing but a false and fraudulent claim and the said power of attorney is illegal, void and nonest in law and does not confer any rights on the said S.P.Velayutham in any manner whatsoever. In fact, under the power of attorney the description of the properties is made with reference to the paimash numbers only while under the sale deed paimash numbers certain survey numbers which have no relation to the same are mentioned. Therefore, it is evident that the said fraudulent power of attorney has been fabricated by the said S.P.Velayutham in collusion with K.S.Deenadayalu Reddiyar and his son Venkatakrishnan for the purpose of grabbing their valuable property and any document or deed executed by the said S.P.Velayutham in pursuance of the said fraudulent power of attorney is also void. Therefore, the sale deed executed by the said S.P.Velayutham as the power of attorney holder of K.S.Deenadayalu Reddiyar and his son Venkatakrishnan in favour of his own son Amar is also null and void.

(ix) (j) that further, in Schedule-A thereunder, an extent of 6.3.11 1/2 Cawnies (8.29 acres approximately) of land referred to by paimash numbers is mentioned while in Schedule-B thereunder, an extent of 9.92 acres of lands covered under various Survey Numbers purportedly co-relating to the paimash numbers mentioned in Schedule-A are mentioned. In any event the extent of 6.3.11 1/2 Cawnies cannot be equal to 9.92 acres. Further, the survey numbers of the properties sought to be conveyed under the sale deed does not co-relate with survey numbers (paimash numbers) of the properties mentioned under the power of attorney and therefore the very sale deed in favour of V.Amar and the subsequent settlement deed in favour of S.P.Velayutham are void, nonest in law and does not confer any right, title or interest upon them.

(ix) (k) Under the sale deed, the said persons have purportedly conveyed to V.Amar, S/o.S.P.Velayutham, an extent of 9.92 acres of lands in Alandur Vilalge, allegedly comprised in the survey numbers mentioned in the Schedule-B thereunder, even while the properties comprised in the said survey numbers does not have any co-relation to the properties covered under the paimash numbers mentioned in Schedule-A thereunder. The actual survey numbers co-relating to the said paimash numbers are entirely different from the survey numbers which are mentioned in Schedule-B. This fraud is clearly established by perusing the PIMASH NUMBER - SURVEY NUMBER co-relation chart enclosed herewith (Annexure-34) as well as the village map and F.M.B.Sketch of Alandur Village (Annexure-35) which shows that the properties comprised in the said Paimash numbers are situate elsewhere and nowhere near our properties. Therefore, it is clear that the said persons have knowingly manipulated the Paimash Numbers and the Survey Numbers of the properties with the sole intention of grabbing a very valuable property owned by their Group including the disputed extents comprised in S.No.16/7.