Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

o. Sri Sanjeev Kumar i Patil, the learned counsel for Sri Praveen Kumar Raikote for the petitioner ig connected Writ Petition No.1018i/2004 submits that although the petitioner was represerited by a counsel, namely, Sri Veerane Gouda who has Hed elaborate 7 written arguments, the sare has. OL been ce consider ed. He submits that the petitioner does net: ktio WW wha Lis the outcome of the Form No. h.

6. Sri Gururaj. Joshi, the earned counsel for the mespondents..7, 8 (a to fc) | and. for the additional has raised a preliminary objection. He submits th at the ics pe titioner's application for the grant of occ pane y rights: is dismissed by the Tribunal by its' order 'date 'is. 07. 1988. The first petitioner himself h has Sona challenged the order. He brings to my