Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: L.K..ADVANI in Combined Discussion On Statutory Resolution Regarding Approval Of ... on 18 March, 2005Matching Fragments
… (Interruptions)
MR. DEPUTY-SPEAKER: Nothing to be recorded except the speech of Shri L.K. Advani.
(Interruptions)* …
={ÉÉvªÉFÉ àÉcÉänªÉ : VÉ¤É +ÉÉ{ÉBÉEä ãÉÉÒb® ¤ÉÉäãÉ ®cä lÉä iÉÉä <vÉ® ºÉä BÉEÉä<Ç xÉcÉÓ ¤ÉÉäãÉÉ* <ºÉÉÊãÉA VÉ¤É <vÉ® ºÉä <xcÉåxÉä ¤ÉÉäãÉxÉÉ ¶ÉÖ°ô ÉÊBÉEªÉÉ cè iÉÉä +ÉÉ{É £ÉÉÒ xÉ ¤ÉÉäãÉå*
gÉÉÒ ãÉÉãÉ BÉßEhÉ +ÉÉb´ÉÉhÉÉÒ : +ÉÉ{É àÉé ºÉàÉZÉiÉÉ cÚÆ +ÉÉ{É ªÉÉäMÉnÉxÉ xÉcÉÓ BÉE® ®cä cé ºÉ®BÉEÉ® BÉEÉä +ÉÆiÉàÉÇÖJÉÉÒ cÉäxÉä BÉEÉ* <Æ]ÅÉäº{ÉèBÉD¶ÉxÉ BÉEÉÒ Vɰô®iÉ cè, xÉcÉÓ iÉÉä AäºÉÉÒ ÉκlÉÉÊiÉ xÉcÉÓ +ÉÉiÉÉÒ* xÉÉè àÉcÉÒxÉä àÉå AäºÉÉ xÉcÉÓ cÖ+ÉÉ*
àÉé ÉÊBÉEºÉÉÒ BÉEÉä BÉEÉä] xÉcÉÓ BÉE® ®cÉ cÚÆ AäºÉÉÒ-AäºÉÉÒ £ÉÉÉÉ BÉEÉ |ɪÉÉäMÉ ÉÊBÉEªÉÉ MɪÉÉ - ºÉ®BÉEÉ® BÉEä ÉÊJÉãÉÉ{ÉE, BÉEÉÆOÉäºÉ BÉEä ÉÊJÉãÉÉ{ÉE* <ºÉBÉEÉ BÉEÉ®hÉ cè this extra sensitivity, ultra sensitivity. =ºÉBÉEÉ ãÉÉ£É cè, nä¶É BÉEÉä {ÉEɪÉnÉ cè* ÉÊb{ÉEèBÉD¶ÉxÉ ªÉÚ.BÉEä àÉå +É{É®ÉvÉ xÉcÉÓ cè* ªÉÚ.BÉEä àÉå +ÉÉVÉ £ÉÉÒ BÉEÉä<Ç àÉèà¤É® ABÉE {ÉÉ]ÉÔ UÉä½BÉE® nںɮÉÒ {ÉÉ]ÉÔ àÉå VÉÉA, iÉÉä BÉEÉä<Ç =ºÉ {É® +ÉÉ{ÉÉÊkÉ xÉcÉÓ BÉE®iÉÉ* àÉÖVÉä ªÉÉn cè ÉÊBÉE ÉÊVÉºÉ ºÉàÉªÉ {ÉcãÉÉÒ ¤ÉÉ® ÉÊb{ÉEèBÉD¶ÉxÉ ãÉÉì ¤ÉxÉÉxÉä BÉEÉÒ ¤ÉÉiÉ +ÉÉ<Ç iÉÉä ãÉÉäMÉ BÉEÉ=Æ] BÉE®iÉä lÉä ÉÊBÉE ÉÊ´Éxº]xÉ SÉÉÌSÉãÉ xÉä ÉÊBÉEiÉxÉÉÒ ¤ÉÉ® {ÉÉÉÌ]ªÉÉÆ ¤ÉnãÉÉÓ* ãÉäÉÊBÉExÉ BÉDªÉÉ =ºÉBÉEÉä ÉÊbºÉ-BÉD´ÉÉÉÊãÉ{ÉEÉ<Ç ÉÊBÉEªÉÉ MɪÉÉ? ªÉc iÉÉä =ºÉBÉEÉÒ
I have always respected Shri L. K. Advani. Today also, like many other occasions, he referred to the fact that the Anti-Defection Law had been misused in the past. He said that through the 91st Amendment, if I am correct, a novel way has been found out and by innuendo he was blaming us for the same, he said that a way has been found out to circumvent, and circumnavigate the Constitutional Amendment by bringing about resignation of Members.
Sir, Shri L. K. Advani is not present here at the moment. I only wish to point out to him that the first time -- if I am mistaken I may please be corrected -- this law was circumnavigated -- I am using the word circumnavigated -- through the device of resignations in Goa, and it was by none other than Shri Parrikar himself. If you are not clear about the dates, I can remind you about the same. It was in August 2004, when one Congress Member was made to resign and then was given the BJP ticket. What was the need for doing it?
SHRI L.K. ADVANI : No, but even consultation, as a convention, has been given the go-by.
SHRI SHIVRAJ V. PATIL: No, it is not so.
SHRI L.K. ADVANI : In the case of Shri Parrikar, in the case of Gujarat, and in all these cases there has been no consultation with the Chief Minister.
SHRI SHIVRAJ V. PATIL: No, it is not so.
gÉÉÒ àÉÉäcxÉ É˺Éc : BÉEƺÉãÉ]ä¶ÉxÉ +ÉÉè®
SHRI L.K. ADVANI : I would be happy if I were able to implement what you have said. But that is not a question of bypassing the Anti-Defection Law. This is bypassing the Anti-Defection Law.
SHRI SHIVRAJ V. PATIL: Advaniji, I would definitely not blame any leadership at the national level for this. I would say that they have done it. If a disease is there at a particular place, apply the medicine there. Do not apply the medicine at a wrong place. … (Interruptions)
SHRI L.K. ADVANI : In the Anti-Defenction Law, see that it cannot be binding.