Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Till the order passed on these mutations are not altered by a competent order passed by the Revenue Court or Revenue Officer, these orders shall be termed as valid orders and there may not, therefore, be any objection in issuing the Fard-e-Intakhab of the land covered by the mutation and setting futher mutation of inheritance under due process of law. The order of Ld. Special Tribunal J&K along with the concerned file of the lower Court was shown to have been sent to Commissioner Agrarian Reforms J&K, Jammu for Page 17 necessary action in the light of the observations made in the order. The Agrarian Reforms Commissioner was supposed to send the copy of the order of Special Tribunal to the concerned Tehsildar Territorial or Agrarian Reforms within whose jurisdiction village Top Sheirkhani was falling. The concerned Tehsildar was required to make note of cancellation on both the Parats of mutation i.e. Parat Sarkar and Parat Patwar. However, Parat Sarkar mutation is said to have been deposited in the Tehsil Record Room. But as the things stand non-induction of entry on a Parat Patwar of the mutation would reveal that needful was not done by the officer concerned who received the copy of the order of the Special Tribunal. It was further intimated that particulars of the Commissioner Agrarian Reforms who was working as such on 13.10.1989 are not readily available in the office and possibility is that that officer might have retired long back. On the other hand, even separate office of the Agrarian Reforms Commissioner were conferred on Financial Commissioner (Revenue) for proceeding with the pending court cases or those which were filed subsequently.