Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: hash value in Ashok S/O. Shankar Meshram vs State Of Mah. Thr. Pso, Ps Desaiganj, ... on 9 January, 2026Matching Fragments
On completion of investigation, the appellant came to be charge-sheeted.
2.3 On committal, the learned Trial Court framed the Charge against the appellant vide Exh. 06 for the offence punishable under Section 376(2)(j)(l) of IPC. The appellant pleaded not-guilty and came to be tried. To prove the charge, the prosecution examined the victim's brother who lodged the First Information Report (for short, 'FIR') as PW-1, Panch Witness for the Spot Panchanamas was examined as PW-2, the Asha Worker was examined as PW-3, the Victim was examined as PW-4, the Doctor who examined the Victim for her pregnancy was 4 CRI.APEAL 343-2023.odt examined as PW-5, the woman police constable who sent a communication for Hash Value was examined as PW-6, the woman police constable who received and issued a communication in respect of DNA samples was examined as PW-7, the medical officer who took the samples of the appellant for DNA was examined as PW-8, the medical officer who examined the victim was examined as PW-9, the police officer who registered and investigated the crime was examined as PW-10.