Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: parole evidence in T.G.Pongiannan vs K.M.Natarajan on 2 April, 2009Matching Fragments
The pith and substance of sub-clause 4 of Section 92 of Indian Evidence Act is, if a party has entered into a contract which is not required to be reduced in writing, but such a contract has been reduced in writing or it is oral, in such situation, it is always open to the parties to the contract to modify its terms and even substitute a new by oral contract and it can be substituted by parole evidence.
14. In terms of Section 92, I proceed to examine the case on hand. Ex.A1 is a registered sale deed. Parties to the document cannot be permitted to let in evidence for the purpose of contradicting, varying, adding or subtracting from its terms the said document.